dangerous

First, i don't think its a good idea to respond here. those that i can i will respond below those that i cannot have to be reserved to msn

1. can't respond. but i must add that again, you speak without reading cases and the actual facts that have passed which do not come out in full in the media. you speak generally and that is how every layman would
2. i never said they should not be compensated for their services or they cannot be trusted with our interests. i said they are way over-paid. there is a difference between being well paid and being over-paid. you think they are being paid to prevent corruption. i think that their salaries are corruption in another form. so i guess its a matter of degree as to what you consider well paid and what i consider over-paid. just do a comparitive study of executive salaries with countries that are not high on the corruption index...

don't post a reply to this pls. i'm not comfortable with this topic on our blog